Sample review record
This is the artifact you’re buying.
Below is a complete Redline review record for a synthetic vendor Master Services Agreement — the same structure you get on your own contracts. Every finding carries a severity, the exact quoted clause, its location, a plain-English risk note, and a suggested next step. Anything Redline couldn’t resolve to the document’s text never appears here.
This contract and every clause below are fabricated for illustration. Redline runs on your machine through your own provider subscription; your real documents never reach us.
HIGH Uncapped indemnification § 8.2
“Vendor shall indemnify and hold Client harmless from any and all claims, losses, and liabilities arising out of the Services, without limitation, including reasonable attorneys’ fees.”
Indemnity is open-ended — no cap and no carve-outs — exposing the client to unbounded liability.
Cap indemnification at fees paid in the trailing 12 months and add standard carve-outs (IP infringement, gross negligence, confidentiality breach).
HIGH Missing limitation of liability absent
The agreement contains no limitation-of-liability clause. Redline confirms a missing protection only after checking the full document — it does not guess.
Add a mutual limitation of liability with an aggregate cap tied to fees paid, plus the usual exclusions for the indemnity above.
MED Auto-renewal with a 90-day notice trap § 3.4
“…renews automatically for successive twelve-month terms unless either party provides written notice no later than ninety (90) days prior to the end of the then-current term.”
A 90-day window is easy to miss; the contract silently renews for another year if notice lapses.
Shorten the notice window, add a calendar obligation, or move to month-to-month after the initial term.
MED Termination for convenience is one-sided § 11.3
“Vendor may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon thirty (30) days’ written notice. Client may terminate only for material breach that remains uncured for sixty (60) days.”
Only the vendor may exit at will; the client is locked in absent a 60-day uncured breach. The remedy is asymmetric.
Make termination for convenience mutual, or add client off-ramps (failure to meet SLAs, change of control).
LOW “Confidential Information” used before it is defined § 6.1
“Each party shall protect the other’s Confidential Information…” — the defined term first appears in § 6.1 but is not defined until § 6.4.
A capitalized defined term is used before its definition, creating ambiguity about scope.
Move the definition ahead of first use, or add a forward reference.
LOW Governing law and venue split § 15.2
“This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Delaware. The parties consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the state and federal courts located in New York County, New York.”
Delaware substantive law paired with New York venue can raise avoidable choice-of-law friction.
Align governing law and venue, or confirm the split is intentional.
Candidate findings that couldn’t be matched to the contract’s own text were dropped before this record was assembled. That’s the point: the report contains what’s checkable, not everything the model guessed.
Run this on your own contracts
Start reviewing — verified, on your machine.
$399/month, 5 seats, cancel anytime. Uses your own Claude Code or OpenAI Codex subscription.
Preview build · macOS 15+ Apple Silicon · unsigned / not notarized.